‘Austerity’ says we all need to tighten our belts; National says the poor and the public have to tighten their belts, but the rich can loosen theirs.

Do yourself a favour; set your bullshit detector to maximum for whenever anyone starts talking about how money doesn’t grow on trees, we have to tighten our belts in this tough economic climate, and that’s why the government are doing what they’re doing.

The simplest response is: if we’re so short of money that you have to sell your ability for future revenue, increase sales taxes, tax kids, put poor people’s prescriptions up a couple of dollars and push public servants, single mums, teachers and students into a crowded job market, then why do you retain your tax cuts for the rich?

Why do you refuse to consider a capital gains tax, which even the OECD, IMF, Treasury and the Reserve Bank – hardly commies – are backing? (Let alone a financial transactions tax).

Yes, we’re in a recession, yes, there are earthquakes.  Yes, there’s debt (which they’ve been rapidly creating ever since they’ve been in power).  But as Campbell Jones has pointed out, pretending their current policies are an inevitable result of the financial situation is “a cover-up that denies the actual agency involved in the politics of austerity”.  A cursory look at the world shows that there is more than one way of responding to a recession or a natural disaster.  This government’s specific response is classic Shock Doctrine; the language is ‘tough times’, ‘debt’ and ‘zero budgets’ but the effect is a systematic drive on all fronts to transfer wealth, power and opportunity away from the poor and the public, towards the rich … ultimately the same global elites who caused the recession and are getting rich holding up the earthquake rebuild.

I’m actually against using the term ‘austerity’ for this onslaught, because ‘austerity’ implies we all need to tighten our belts in a recession.  National says the poor and the public have to tighten their belts, but the rich can loosen theirs even further.

Why?  Because National is run by neo-liberal ideologues, and whatever the financial situation, that’s what these ideologues consistently and dogmatically believe is best for the world.  The rich are the ‘job creators’, the ‘innovators’, the ‘drivers of growth’.  The rich HAVE to be given their holiday homes in Hawaii, because the only way of making people work and create is by dangling a holiday home in Hawaii in front of their faces.  Even in a recession – especially in a recession – no price is too high to give the rich more money.  If it puts us in deficit, so be it; ‘balancing the books’ is another great excuse to implement more of neo-liberalism’s dogmas: the reduction of public ownership, public services, welfare and anything else that might soften individual competition.

The National party are doing their utmost to make this country a theocracy, run not on empirical research or rational enquiry but on blind faith in the doctrines of a shoddy new-age religion called neo-liberalism.  The dogma is that the market will be our saviour, and should be our lord.  The utopia is economic growth as the sole human end.  And the men with nice suits and bulging investments are the Brian Tamakis, saying give us all your money, and you’ll be blessed hundredfold when it all trickles back down, someday, somehow, eventually.


  1. Pingback: Strong gains in the inequality and unaffordability industry « Cut Your Hair
  2. Pingback: Rhetoric and reality « Cut Your Hair
  3. Pingback: Smoking Hot Politics | Who is this ‘y’all’ that Joe Biden believes will be ‘back in chains?’
  4. Pingback: With rising unemployment, unprecedented inequality and obscene child poverty, welfare cuts are not an achievement. « Cut Your Hair
  5. Pingback: The central message of welfare reform – and why National needs to miss the point « Cut Your Hair
  6. Pingback: The scorecard so far on child poverty « Cut Your Hair
  7. Pingback: The ideology of middle class struggle « Cut Your Hair
  8. Pingback: Brownlee’s latest emission « Cut Your Hair
  9. Pingback: Now the politicians are struggling too? « Cut Your Hair
  10. Pingback: Let’s get one thing clear | Cut Your Hair
  11. Tracy Jane

    Capital gains tax – so last century
    “The Labour Party’s desperate capital gains tax plan, so far from being bold, will do nothing for the economy or the country,” says John Pemberton, Deputy Leader of Democrats for social credit (DSC).

    “The USA has had a capital gains tax for many decades, but it has not stopped housing bubbles or redistributed the tax burden more fairly,” Pemberton continues. “Taxing capital gains is a complicated and costly exercise in futility, a last century concept along with the National Party’s asset sales and other out-dated ideas.”

    “What New Zealand needs is a 21st Century tax system that is truly fair and takes advantage of modern technology. DSC strongly supports a Financial Transactions Tax (FTT). FTT is a tax with no loopholes, so that those high income earners that currently avoid paying tax will at last contribute to Government revenue.”

    “FTT is entirely cost-effective,” claims Pemberton. “Banking software already exists to collect withholding tax, so there is no need to re-invent the wheel. An effective FTT rate, one that will both slow rampant speculation and collect sufficient revenue for Government needs, can be so low that even the poorest families will hardly notice it.”

    “Faced with FTT, investors will be encouraged to put their money into the real economy for the long term, into businesses that produce actual goods or services. We may see a more stable currency, as FTT shaves the tiny profit margins of the money traders.”

    “FTT will start collecting revenue immediately, unlike CGT which will not be realised until well into the future.”
    Pemberton sees capital gains tax as little more than costly bureaucracy at best, and a windfall for tax lawyers.
    “At worst, it will drive even more middle income families out of business and the housing market, leaving the field clear for the biggest players,” he warns. “Capital gains tax may sound good to some on the hustings, but voters should know that it is not as simple as a choice between two evils: capital gains or asset sales.”
    “With FTT, we don’t need either one.”


Leave a comment...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s